New research being presented at Euroanaesthesia, the annual meeting of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC), held online this year, suggests that using 3D printing and virtual reality can improve patient care and reduce anaesthesiologist stress and equipment wastage.
An anaesthesia team from the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center in Israel report on the use of 3D technology to prepare for operations in 20 patients, including a 35-week-old foetus who required caesarean delivery and an 83-year old woman requiring open heart surgery.
The majority of cases reported in the study involve children undergoing lung surgery, but the technology was also used to devise personalised plans for patients with large mediastinal masses (MM) in the chest that compress the heart and lung, including one pregnant woman.
“Using imaging scans, our anaesthesia team were able to print highly accurate models of patient airways on which to plan and practice their procedures,” explained Dr Ruth Shaylor, lead author of the report. “This is particularly important in children because they are smaller and so is our margin for error. Being able to see, hold and rotate a precise replica of their patient’s airway gives a new angle on their cases, providing information on the most appropriate airway equipment that might be invisible on a flat scan.”
A 3D model can be made in 30 minutes, and a single print can be turned around in 3-4 hours on entry-level 3D printers. Although the technology is widely used in other medical specialities like orthopaedic surgery, paediatric cardiology and dentistry, the use of 3D printing and virtual reality in anaesthesia has been primarily for education and training.
In 2019, the anaesthesia department at Tel Aviv Medical Center started using 3D printing and virtual reality modelling to routinely assess patients before surgery who had a potentially difficult airway due to narrowing or a large MM, as well as children requiring one-lung ventilation so surgery could be performed on the other lung.
To examine the potential benefits of these technologies to anaesthetic management, Shaylor and colleagues retrospectively reviewed all 20 patients referred for 3D modelling as part of their anaesthesia plan between July 2019 and July 2021. In general, 3D printing was used for airway cases (15 patients) with virtual reality for large MM cases (3 patients).
Results showed that when 3D printing was used, the airway plan practiced on the model ended up being the final airway plan in 13 of the 15 (87%) patients. This reduced the potential for trial and error during surgery. There were two cases where the model plan was either more conservative (the equipment used was larger than the model suggested), and one case in which a model could not be made because of poor initial imaging scans.
Using imaging scans, our anaesthesia team were able to print highly accurate models of patient airways on which to plan and practice their procedures.
After reviewing virtual reality images, none of the MM patients had to have invasive procedures performed before being anaesthetised. In addition, there were no reports of any anaesthetic complications in patients referred for 3D modelling.
“3D printing is still underutilised for patient-specific pre-operative planning in anaesthesia”, says Dr Shaylor. “Our 2-year experience shows that with a specific plan in place, trial and error are reduced, and there is less trauma to the patient and wastage of equipment. The anaesthesiologists involved in these cases reported less stress, and by reviewing them with the surgeons, there was a greater understanding of the challenges involved for each patient. We also found that sharing these models with patients gave them a deeper understanding of their upcoming surgery and helped improve communication.”
